Fight Response & Narcissism: How Trauma Creates Control
Written by Roland Bal
A dialogue means to hold space, to listen, and to learn from one another. It is a process of creating synergy in which you come from a place of not knowing, while sharing your thoughts and feelings and allowing them to be reflected upon by another person.
A discussion is to hold an opinion and pit it against somebody else's for the sake of argument and in order to gain the upper hand. It is the attempting to establish your "truth" by dominating the other person.
Start your recovery from narcissistic abuse today
How Unresolved Trauma Creates the Need for Control
My stance is that the root cause of all war is unprocessed trauma.
When dialogue is absent or becomes discussion, self-righteousness and self-importance take precedence. Self-righteousness is an outcome of uncontained and unresolved anger. Think opposites; when you are made to feel small, you want to feel significant.
In light of trauma, this movement of opposites goes to extremes. The need for control isn't a personality flaw — it's a survival mechanism that hardened into a way of being. To understand how this same pattern operates at the societal level, read root cause of narcissism.
The Fight Response: Survival Strategy or Path to Narcissism?
When your survival strategy is to fight — in order to compensate for an internal childhood experience of feeling unworthy — you will be constantly on the lookout for opportunities to gain dominance and control.
That gaining dominance and control is your way of avoiding your residual emotional pain. The perpetuation of those survival patterns through a fight response possibly contributes to the making of narcissists and psychopaths.
Self-righteousness is an outcome of uncontained and unresolved anger. Think opposites; when you are made to feel small, you want to feel significant.
Conflict, and the overcoming of that conflict, will continue to be your prime motivation, and also the mechanism through which you avoid your emotional pain. This is why trauma is at the root of narcissistic patterns — and why the fight response, left unprocessed, can harden into a need for control that defines entire personalities.
Get the free e-course on narcissistic abuse recovery
Why Narcissists Need to Dominate: The Wound Underneath the Control
Underneath every narcissistic need to dominate is a wound that was never allowed to heal. The child who was made to feel worthless, invisible, or fundamentally flawed does not simply outgrow those feelings. They build an identity around never feeling that way again.
The fight response becomes a shield. If I can control you, I don't have to feel out of control. If I can dominate this situation, I don't have to feel the helplessness I felt as a child. If I can make you feel small, I don't have to feel my own smallness.
This is why narcissists are so reactive to perceived slights, criticism, or challenges to their authority. It's not that they're confident — it's that their sense of self is built on avoiding the emotional collapse that would come if they ever stopped fighting. The need for control isn't strength. It's a defense against feeling the original wound.
Survival Strategies and Identification with Abusive Patterns
We "choose" a survival strategy that best fits our situation, and that we can identify with. If you grow up with a father who is overbearing, belittling, controlling, and he consistently tries to dominate everything and everyone, it is likely you will adopt a similar "fight" approach in order to live up to your father's standards.
If you have a father who is overbearing, belittling, and controlling, but acts submissive, reclusive, and isolating towards others, you might adopt a similar "flight" strategy to deal with your ongoing stress.
You "choose" either fight, flight, or a please-appease strategy to deal with ongoing traumatic stress in order to survive. That "choice" is further influenced by whom you identify with in your direct surroundings when you are young.
Fight vs Fawn: How Trauma Responses Shape Relationships
It isn't just those who have a fight survival response as their main character drive who are doing the damage, though. Those who default to a flight or please-appease response are equally contributing to the state of affairs that our personal and collective relationships are in.
When you "choose" the act of not acting — neglect — you fail to set boundaries and give healthy feedback to those who tend to act out of their fight response, while those who act out of a fight response and do not consider another person's well being pushes those with a flight-please response more inward. Hand in glove.
This is why narcissistic abuse requires both sides of the dynamic. The fight response creates the controller; the fawn response creates the compliant target. To understand how this dynamic plays out in relationships, read the dynamics between a narcissist and a people-pleaser.
There is a need for both sides to learn how to build better relationships that tend towards dialogue, rather than discussion.
How Childhood Trauma Creates Narcissistic Patterns
Children don't choose their survival strategies consciously. They adapt to what works — what keeps them safe, what earns approval, what avoids punishment. If aggression and dominance were modeled as the way to get needs met, the child learns to fight. If submission and compliance were the only path to survival, the child learns to fawn.
The tragedy is that these adaptations, necessary in childhood, become the prison in adulthood. The fight response that protected you from an overbearing father becomes the pattern that destroys your relationships. The fawn response that kept you safe from an unpredictable mother becomes the pattern that erases your sense of self.
Narcissistic patterns are not genetic. They are learned. And what is learned can, with awareness and work, be unlearned. But first you have to see the pattern for what it is — not a character flaw, but a survival strategy that has outlived its usefulness.
Are you ready to heal from narcissistic abuse?
Cultivating Balance: Moving Beyond Fixed Survival Responses
It is only when you willingly start to take that journey inward — as opposed to projecting, reenacting, and reinforcing your traumatic patterns outwardly — that you can start to move away from a fixed fight, flight, or please-appease response.
When you move away from your fixed survival response, you can start to balance out your default character structure by engaging some of its opposites; for example, if you hold and work through the traumatic residue that relates to your default fight response, you will perhaps be able to be more compassionate — a healthy please response — and hold yourself (importance) in abeyance — a healthy controlled flight response.
Equally so, if your default is flight or please-appease, you need to learn to reestablish boundaries — a healthy fight response — and thereby reclaim a sense of self and self-worth.
For a deeper understanding of how to work through these patterns, explore the narcissistic abuse recovery article.
Signs You're Stuck in a Fight or Fawn Pattern
If your default is the fight response, you may recognize these patterns: a constant need to be right, difficulty admitting mistakes, relationships that feel like competitions, anger that flares quickly when you feel challenged, and a deep discomfort with vulnerability or dependence on others.
If your default is the fawn response, the signs look different: chronic people-pleasing, difficulty knowing what you actually want, relationships where you give far more than you receive, anxiety around conflict or disapproval, and a sense that your identity depends on how others see you.
Neither pattern is "better" or "worse." Both are survival adaptations that come at a cost. The fight response costs you intimacy and connection. The fawn response costs you boundaries and self-worth. Recognizing which pattern dominates your life is the first step toward building something more balanced.



5 Comments
Great article thank you Roland.
Welcome!
This reminds me of The Origins of War in Child Abuse by Lloyd DeMause. A brutal read but an interesting perspective.
Haven't read. Thanks for sharing.
Lloyd de Maude also wrote his surprising findings in his significant research on the history of childhood uncovering abuse and infanticide of children as a universal phenomenon across all cultures including aboriginal
Leave a Comment